ABSTRACT
Currently, a rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical settings such as patients from emergency surgery is needed. The QuantuMDx Q-POC assay is a real-time-PCR test that was created for the rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 in only 30 min. This study aimed to compare QuantuMDx Q-POC with our standard algorithm with Cobas 6800 for SARS-CoV-2 detection. The samples were run in parallel in both platforms. First, a comparison analysis was carried out. Second, the limit of detection was determinate in both platforms using a serial dilution of SARS-CoV-2 inactivated virus. A total of 234 samples were analyzed. For a Ct <30, the sensitivity and specificity was 100.0% and 92.5%, respectively. Positive predictive value was 86.2% and negative predictive value was 100.0%. Both COBAS 6800 and QuantuMDx Q-POC could detect up to 100 copies/mL. The QuantuMDx Q-POC system it is a reliable option when a rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 is necessary. IMPORTANCE In different health care settings, such as patients from emergency surgery, rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 is needed. The QuantuMDx Q-POC is an automatized fast workflow platform based on detection of three genes: two genes encoding structural proteins that can be used to differentiate SARS-CoV-2 from other coronavirus and a third target gene encoding a nonstructural region that is unique for SARS-CoV-2 such as the open reading frame (ORF1). This assay enables a rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 with a high sensitivity in a short time frame (30 min). Therefore, QuantuMDx is a simple, rapid and easy SARS-CoV-2 detection test from direct middle nasal swabs.
ABSTRACT
The immense impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health systems has motivated the scientific community to search for clinical prognostic factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Low cycle threshold values (Ct) of diagnostic real-time RT-PCR assays in hospitalized patients have been associated with a poor prognosis in several studies, whereas other studies did not find this association. We explored whether SARS-CoV-2 Ct values at diagnosis were associated with a poor outcome (admission to hospital and death) in 604 community patients diagnosed at primary health centers. Although lower Ct values were found in patients who died of COVID-19, the Ct value was not significantly associated with a worse outcome in a multivariate analysis, while age remained an independent prognostic factor. We did not find evidence to support the role of Ct values as a prognostic factor of COVID-19 in community cases.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To describe the burden, epidemiology and outcomes of co-infections and superinfections occurring in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: We performed an observational cohort study of all consecutive patients admitted for ≥48 hours to the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona for COVID-19 (28 February to 22 April 2020) who were discharged or dead. We describe demographic, epidemiologic, laboratory and microbiologic results, as well as outcome data retrieved from electronic health records. RESULTS: Of a total of 989 consecutive patients with COVID-19, 72 (7.2%) had 88 other microbiologically confirmed infections: 74 were bacterial, seven fungal and seven viral. Community-acquired co-infection at COVID-19 diagnosis was uncommon (31/989, 3.1%) and mainly caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus. A total of 51 hospital-acquired bacterial superinfections, mostly caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli, were diagnosed in 43 patients (4.7%), with a mean (SD) time from hospital admission to superinfection diagnosis of 10.6 (6.6) days. Overall mortality was 9.8% (97/989). Patients with community-acquired co-infections and hospital-acquired superinfections had worse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Co-infection at COVID-19 diagnosis is uncommon. Few patients developed superinfections during hospitalization. These findings are different compared to those of other viral pandemics. As it relates to hospitalized patients with COVID-19, such findings could prove essential in defining the role of empiric antimicrobial therapy or stewardship strategies.